Government & Public Sector Sample only · Reservations open Page created Mar 5, 2026

List of Election Technology and Voting System Vendors

List of election technology vendors with EAC certification status, product offerings, deployment footprint, and contact details — structured for government procurement officers evaluating voting system upgrades.

Fields we plan to include

Company Name
Headquarters
EAC Certification Status
Product Categories
States Deployed
VVSG Compliance Level
System Types
Accessibility Features
Audit Capabilities
Contact Information
Website
Year Founded

Data Preview

* Free sample rows, unverified and may contain errors. The full list isn't available yet.
Company NameHeadquartersEAC CertifiedStates Deployed
Election Systems & Software (ES&S)Omaha, NEYes42+
Dominion Voting SystemsDenver, CO / Toronto, ONYes27+
Hart InterCivicAustin, TXYes18+
Clear Ballot GroupBoston, MAYes14
SmartmaticLondon, UKYes2

Estimated ~45 entries. We'll only compile the full list if enough people reserve it.

* No charge now. Purchase is optional.

Understanding the Election Technology Vendor Landscape

The U.S. election technology market is dominated by three vendors — ES&S, Dominion Voting Systems, and Hart InterCivic — which collectively serve approximately 92% of American voters. This concentration creates both procurement challenges and opportunities for county election administrators evaluating infrastructure upgrades.

Market Structure and Certification

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) maintains a Voting System Test Laboratory program and certifies systems against the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG). As of 2025, the EAC has over 20 registered manufacturers, though only a fraction hold active federal certifications. State-level certification adds another layer — each state maintains its own approved vendor list, often with requirements beyond federal standards.

VendorU.S. Market Share (est.)Key Product Line
ES&S~50%ExpressVote, DS200/DS950
Dominion~30%Democracy Suite, ImageCast
Hart InterCivic~12%Verity, Vanguard
Others~8%Various

Emerging Vendors and Open-Source Alternatives

VotingWorks has emerged as a notable non-profit entrant, offering open-source voting systems designed for auditability and transparency. Clear Ballot Group, based in Boston, serves 14 states and over 46 million registered voters with its ClearVote platform, focusing on post-election audit capabilities.

Procurement Considerations

VVSG 2.0 Compliance
Hart InterCivic's Vanguard became the first system to achieve VVSG 2.0 EAC certification — the latest national standard. Procurement teams should evaluate whether vendors are actively pursuing 2.0 certification.
Total Cost of Ownership
Hardware acquisition is typically 30-40% of total lifecycle cost. Maintenance contracts, software licensing, training, and election-day support often exceed initial purchase price over a 10-year deployment cycle.
Security and Audit Trail
Post-2020 emphasis on voter-verified paper audit trails (VVPAT) has made ballot-marking devices with paper backup a de facto requirement in most jurisdictions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q.Where does the data come from?

Full lists would be compiled from public sources such as official registries, industry association rosters and company websites. The sample rows on each page come from web searches and are unverified. Organization info only — no personal contact details.

Q.Is the full list available now?

Not yet. Sample rows are free. We only compile a full list if enough people reserve it. If we do, we'll email everyone who reserved it a purchase link (buying is optional). If we don't, nothing happens and you're never charged.

Q.What does it cost?

Sample rows are free. A full list is $49, paid only if we compile it and you decide to buy. There is no free trial or subscription.

Q.What format is it delivered in?

CSV (opens in Excel or Google Sheets). There is no API.