Government & Public Sector 2026Updated

List of Election Technology and Voting System Vendors

Comprehensive directory of election technology vendors with EAC certification status, product offerings, deployment footprint, and contact details — structured for government procurement officers evaluating voting system upgrades.

Available Data Fields

Company Name
Headquarters
EAC Certification Status
Product Categories
States Deployed
VVSG Compliance Level
System Types
Accessibility Features
Audit Capabilities
Contact Information
Website
Year Founded

Data Preview

* Full data requires registration
Company NameHeadquartersEAC CertifiedStates Deployed
Election Systems & Software (ES&S)Omaha, NEYes42+
Dominion Voting SystemsDenver, CO / Toronto, ONYes27+
Hart InterCivicAustin, TXYes18+
Clear Ballot GroupBoston, MAYes14
SmartmaticLondon, UKYes2

45+ records available for download.

* Continue from free preview

Understanding the Election Technology Vendor Landscape

The U.S. election technology market is dominated by three vendors — ES&S, Dominion Voting Systems, and Hart InterCivic — which collectively serve approximately 92% of American voters. This concentration creates both procurement challenges and opportunities for county election administrators evaluating infrastructure upgrades.

Market Structure and Certification

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) maintains a Voting System Test Laboratory program and certifies systems against the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG). As of 2025, the EAC has over 20 registered manufacturers, though only a fraction hold active federal certifications. State-level certification adds another layer — each state maintains its own approved vendor list, often with requirements beyond federal standards.

VendorU.S. Market Share (est.)Key Product Line
ES&S~50%ExpressVote, DS200/DS950
Dominion~30%Democracy Suite, ImageCast
Hart InterCivic~12%Verity, Vanguard
Others~8%Various

Emerging Vendors and Open-Source Alternatives

VotingWorks has emerged as a notable non-profit entrant, offering open-source voting systems designed for auditability and transparency. Clear Ballot Group, based in Boston, serves 14 states and over 46 million registered voters with its ClearVote platform, focusing on post-election audit capabilities.

Procurement Considerations

VVSG 2.0 Compliance
Hart InterCivic's Vanguard became the first system to achieve VVSG 2.0 EAC certification — the latest national standard. Procurement teams should evaluate whether vendors are actively pursuing 2.0 certification.
Total Cost of Ownership
Hardware acquisition is typically 30-40% of total lifecycle cost. Maintenance contracts, software licensing, training, and election-day support often exceed initial purchase price over a 10-year deployment cycle.
Security and Audit Trail
Post-2020 emphasis on voter-verified paper audit trails (VVPAT) has made ballot-marking devices with paper backup a de facto requirement in most jurisdictions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q.Does this dataset include state-level certification details or only federal EAC certification?

The dataset captures both EAC federal certification status and known state-level certifications. Since state certification requirements vary, our AI crawls each state's Secretary of State or election authority website at request time to retrieve the most current approved vendor lists.

Q.How current is the vendor deployment data?

When you request the full dataset, our AI crawls vendor websites, EAC records, and public procurement databases in real time to compile current deployment information. This is not a static database — data reflects what is publicly available at the time of your request.

Q.Can I filter vendors by specific product capabilities like ballot-on-demand or electronic poll books?

Yes. You can specify product categories, accessibility features, audit capabilities, or any combination of technical requirements. The AI will filter vendors based on publicly available product specifications and certification documents.

Q.Does the data include pricing or contract terms?

Pricing is generally not publicly disclosed by election technology vendors. The dataset includes publicly available information such as product lines, certifications, and deployment footprint. For pricing, you would need to issue an RFP directly to vendors.