Legal Services 2026Updated

List of Law Firms Specializing in Patent Troll Defense

Directory of U.S. law firms with proven track records defending companies against patent assertion entities (PAEs) and non-practicing entities (NPEs), including PTAB specialists and district court litigators across major jurisdictions.

Available Data Fields

Firm Name
Headquarters
NPE Defense Focus
PTAB Cases Filed
Key Jurisdictions
Notable NPE Wins
Technical Specialties
Number of IP Attorneys
Contact Email
Website

Data Preview

* Full data requires registration
Firm NameHeadquartersNPE Defense FocusKey Jurisdictions
Fish & Richardson P.C.Boston, MAPrimary — #1 most active patent defense firm (Lex Machina)E.D. TX, D. DE, N.D. CA, W.D. TX + 24 districts
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLPWashington, DCPrimary — 250+ litigators, top PTAB filerD. DE, E.D. TX, N.D. CA, ITC, PTAB
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox PLLCWashington, DCPrimary — IP boutique, 271+ PTAB cases (2019-2021)PTAB, D. DE, E.D. VA, Federal Circuit
Perkins Coie LLPSeattle, WAPrimary — #4 national patent defense (200+ cases, 27 jurisdictions)W.D. WA, N.D. CA, D. DE, C.D. CA
Alston & Bird LLPAtlanta, GAPrimary — Patexia top 5 patent defense (2026)N.D. GA, D. DE, E.D. TX, Federal Circuit

500+ records available for download.

* Continue from free preview

Navigating Patent Assertion Entity Litigation: Finding the Right Defense Counsel

NPE lawsuits surged roughly 20% in 2025, driven partly by reduced PTAB discretionary denials that embolden assertion entities to file in district court. Over half of all NPE targets have annual revenues under $25 million — meaning startups and mid-market companies bear disproportionate risk from demand letters that can escalate to seven-figure litigation costs before trial.

What Separates Effective NPE Defense Counsel

Not every patent litigator understands the economics of troll litigation. The best NPE defense firms share several traits:

PTAB Fluency
Inter partes review (IPR) petitions at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board remain the most powerful tool for invalidating weak patents. Firms like Fish & Richardson (471 PTAB cases, 2019–2021), Finnegan (293 cases), and Sterne Kessler (271 cases) dominate this space because they combine technical depth with procedural mastery.
Multi-District Reach
NPEs forum-shop aggressively — the Eastern District of Texas, Western District of Texas, and District of Delaware account for the majority of filings. Defense firms operating across 20+ districts can respond without local counsel delays.
Early Case Assessment
Experienced firms quickly evaluate claim scope, prior art landscape, and settlement economics to determine whether to fight, challenge at PTAB, or negotiate — avoiding the trap of over-litigating weak claims or under-fighting strong positions.

Key Defense Strategies

StrategyWhen to UseTypical Timeline
IPR at PTABWeak prior art position of asserted patent12–18 months
Alice/§101 MotionSoftware or business method patents3–6 months
Early Markman HearingNarrow claim construction favors defendant6–12 months
Declaratory JudgmentPre-empt suit in favorable jurisdictionVaries
Joint Defense GroupNPE targeting multiple defendants in same campaignOngoing

Cost Considerations

Patent litigation typically costs $1–5 million through trial, but NPE defense firms increasingly offer alternative fee arrangements — flat fees for PTAB petitions, blended rates for early-stage defense, and success-based structures. Organizations like RPX and Unified Patents also provide collective defense mechanisms, with RPX purchasing patents preemptively and Unified filing IPRs on behalf of member companies.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q.How does ReqoData determine which firms specialize in patent troll defense?

We crawl public sources including court dockets (PACER), PTAB filings, legal directories (Chambers, Legal 500, Lex Machina reports), and firm websites to identify firms with substantial NPE/PAE defense caseloads. The data reflects publicly available litigation records, not proprietary rankings.

Q.Does the dataset include win/loss rates against NPEs?

Where public records permit, we include case outcomes and dispositions for NPE defense matters. Note that many patent cases settle confidentially, so win/loss data reflects only publicly resolved matters — not sealed settlements.

Q.Can I filter by the type of patent technology at issue?

Yes. You can request firms filtered by technical domain — software, telecom, medical devices, semiconductors, etc. — since NPE defense effectiveness varies significantly by technology area and claim type.

Q.How current is the litigation data?

When you request the dataset, our AI crawls the latest publicly available court records and firm profiles in real time. This is not a static database — each request pulls fresh data from public sources.