Trade Finance 2026Updated

List of Trade Finance Receivables Securitization Arrangers

Comprehensive database of banks and specialist firms that structure and arrange trade receivables securitization programs, helping corporates access capital markets for lower-cost working capital financing.

Available Data Fields

Company Name
Headquarters
Securitization Type
Deal Size Range
Geographic Coverage
Asset Classes
Rating Agency Relationships
Conduit Programs
Industry Specialization
Contact Email
Website

Data Preview

* Full data requires registration
Company NameHeadquartersSecuritization TypeGeographic Coverage
Finacity CorporationStamford, CT, USATrue Sale / Off-Balance SheetGlobal (212 debtor countries)
BNP ParibasParis, FranceMulti-seller Conduit / BespokeEurope, Americas, Asia-Pacific
Societe GeneraleParis, FranceABCP Conduit / BespokeEurope, Americas, Africa
CitiNew York, NY, USAMulti-seller Conduit / BespokeGlobal (120+ countries)
MUFG BankTokyo, JapanABCP Conduit / BilateralAsia-Pacific, Europe, Americas

100+ records available for download.

* Continue from free preview

Trade Finance Receivables Securitization Arrangers

Trade receivables securitization enables corporates to convert outstanding invoices into tradeable securities, unlocking working capital at costs significantly below traditional bank factoring. Arrangers serve as the critical intermediary — structuring the special purpose vehicle (SPV), negotiating with rating agencies, and placing notes with capital markets investors.

Market Landscape

The global receivables securitization market reached USD 2.89 trillion in 2024 and is projected to grow at 8.2% CAGR through 2033. The arranger landscape spans three tiers:

Global Bank Arrangers
BNP Paribas, Citi, Societe Generale, MUFG, and Deutsche Bank operate multi-seller ABCP conduit programs that pool receivables from multiple originators across geographies.
Specialist Arrangers
Firms like Finacity (which has facilitated over trillion in funded receivables across 133 currencies) focus exclusively on structuring receivables securitization for mid-market and large corporates.
Regional Players
Banks such as NORD/LB, ING, Rabobank, and Natixis arrange programs with strong regional expertise, often co-arranging with global banks on cross-border deals.

Key Program Structures

StructureBest ForTypical Size
Multi-seller ABCP ConduitLarge corporates with diversified receivables$250M–$2B+
Single-seller SPVInvestment-grade corporates with concentrated portfolios$100M–$500M
Whole Business SecuritizationCompanies with predictable, recurring receivables$500M+

What to Evaluate in an Arranger

Corporate treasurers selecting an arranger should assess:

  • Conduit capacity — available commitment in the arranger’s ABCP program
  • Multi-currency and multi-jurisdiction capability — critical for global receivables pools spanning dozens of debtor countries
  • Rating agency relationships — experienced arrangers streamline the rating process, reducing time to market
  • Legal and tax structuring — particularly important for cross-border true sale opinions and bankruptcy remoteness
  • Ongoing administration — post-closing servicing, compliance reporting, and portfolio monitoring

Recent Notable Transactions

Recent deals illustrate the scale and diversity of the market:

  • Finacity and NORD/LB arranged an $880 million trade receivables securitization for CMA CGM, one of the world’s largest shipping lines
  • Societe Generale, MUFG, Natixis, Rabobank, and ING co-arranged a $1.7 billion facility for commodity trader Mercuria
  • Finacity facilitated a $550 million global freight receivables securitization renewal for Hapag-Lloyd

Frequently Asked Questions

Q.How does this dataset differ from a generic structured finance directory?

This dataset focuses specifically on arrangers active in trade receivables securitization, not broader ABS/MBS markets. Each entry includes deal-relevant fields like conduit capacity, multi-currency capability, and asset class specialization that matter for receivables programs.

Q.Can I find arrangers for sub-$100M programs?

Yes. While global bank conduits typically target larger programs, specialist arrangers like Finacity have structured facilities as small as $50–100 million for mid-market corporates.

Q.How current is the arranger information?

When you request data, our AI crawls the web in real time to gather the latest publicly available information on each arranger, including recent deal activity and current program details.

Q.Does the data include arranger league table rankings?

The dataset focuses on operational capabilities rather than league table positions. However, fields like deal size range and recent transactions give you a practical view of each arranger’s market activity.